Nazi town?

[Cedric of Worthing]

I have heard that there are towns in Norway and Sweden where everybody is a National Socialist. Is this true?

[folkandfaith]

I don't know about that, but here in America we live under a Fascist state and they are trying to force in some pretty subtantial National Socialistic ideas with the brown fuhrer currently. Does that count?

NSism is a stateist and top down approach where the state is all and all are simply cogs in the wheel of the state. Not a very healthy society.

As well as has been documented meticulously on the forum part of the site along with elsewhere on the web, Mr Hitler was under the control of wallstreet "capitalists" along with Zionist control. Again, not a very healthy society and not a very libertarian or freedom loving approach to anything so why would anyone care if such a stateist and beuracratic place existed or not? It isn't anywhere close to the vision of FNF styled small communities..

[Cedric of Worthing]

I don't know about that, but here in America we live under a Fascist state and they are trying to force in some pretty subtantial National Socialistic ideas with the brown fuhrer currently. Does that count?

NSism is a stateist and top down approach where the state is all and all are simply cogs in the wheel of the state. Not a very healthy society.

As well as has been documented meticulously on the forum part of the site along with elsewhere on the web, Mr Hitler was under the control of wallstreet "capitalists" along with Zionist control. Again, not a very healthy society and not a very libertarian or freedom loving approach to anything so why would anyone care if such a stateist and beuracratic place existed or not? It isn't anywhere close to the vision of FNF styled small communities..

You have some interesting ideas about Hitler. I have actually studied him a lot (and I mean at a university, not just google searches) but I have not heard any of the things you just mentioned. You also have a very simplistic idea of NS. It does make it easier, yes, but such a complex idealogy as National Socialism cannot be summed up in so few words. Yes, there is a top down approach but that it very normal and it is the way power has worked since the 20th century. I thought this was a pre-modernist web site.

I hope my opinions are not offending you, you seem to object to me being on this forum with is a shame. If that is the case, and I do hope it is not, I will leave without a fight.

[folkandfaith]

I simply object to this fascist approach of a fuhrer like individual telling the masses what to think and the masses simply following along like cattle.

Consider:

"Naturally the common people don't want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor in Germany. That is understood. But after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. ...Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country."

"How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think" -- Adolf Hitler.

"The masses have never thirsted after truth. Whoever can supply them with illusions is easily their master; whoever attempts to destroy their illusions is always their victim"

Gustave Le Bon was a psychologist that Hitler had taken many ideas from, namely what is termed as "social darwinism" or strong trampling under their feet those that are "weak".


It is from Le Bon that many ideas were taken it seems. Some of these ideas are what now composes "fascism" or -  the idea that the masses need to be led and are all just inherently dumb animals that NEED a strong iron fisted shepherd to "lead" them, that individuals matter not - that the state and the propagation of it is what matters, and that liberty and rights are just communistic ideas or utopian ideas that have no place under that of the state or at least have very little place in society and can be taken away at the drop of the that.  These are what I object to. Not you as an individual.

As for the Rothschild's financing Herr Hitler, please see the documentary in the films section or scroogle.org some generic terms such as Hitler financed by Rothschild, Rothschild Eugenics, Wallstreet funds Hitler and the likes. As well, read up on the fight between Otto Strasser and Hitler as to why the Strassers were so furious at Hitler - namely all of their bottom level up socialist ideas were ignored once Hitler came to power and he started getting funds from the very "capitalists" (so called) that they had all said that they disagreed with. This infuriated the Strassers (read "Hitler and I" which I think is in the stickied thread Revolutionary Reading) and shortly thereafter Hitler had one of them murdered for daring to go against the leader of the state. Sounds vaguely familiar, both this and the Goering/Le bon sort of ideas to Bush Sr, Clinton, Bush Jr. and now Obama or modern day american presidents and those that control these puppets on strings.

Poster JW as well has done some great research that helps explain the financing of Hitler as well if you are anything like i was once and had a hard time believing that Hitler wasn't some really great guy fighting for the people of Germany and thus just got a bad rap for daring to oppose the NWO. Looks more and more like he was just another one of the boys club that eventually had to be dealt with or lost his usefulness to the system so he was disposed of.